37:{"facet_counts":[{"counts":[{"count":1,"highlighted":"decision","value":"decision"}],"field_name":"documentType","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":1}},{"counts":[{"count":1,"highlighted":"VwGH","value":"VwGH"}],"field_name":"institution","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":1}},{"counts":[],"field_name":"lawType","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":0}},{"counts":[],"field_name":"legalCategories","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":0}},{"counts":[],"field_name":"state","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":0}}],"found":1,"found_docs":1,"grouped_hits":[{"found":1,"group_key":["jwt_2025090030_20250709l00"],"hits":[{"document":{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2025/09/0030","apiPath":["Vwgh"],"changedDate":1756944000000,"citation":"Ra 2025/09/0030","contentType":"head","decisionDate":1752019200000,"documentType":"decision","hasSummary":false,"id":"jwt_2025090030_20250709l00","institution":["VwGH"],"institutionType":"Gericht","keywords":[],"legalCategories":[],"normId":"jwt_2025090030_20250709l00","publishedDate":1754352000000,"refs":[{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2024/09/0086","Rechtssatznummer":"3","citation":"Ra 2024/09/0086","documentType":"decision","id":"jwr_2024090086_20250603l03","institution":["VwGH"],"normId":"jwr_2024090086_20250603l03","value":"Ra 2024/09/0086"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2024/09/0086","Rechtssatznummer":"4","citation":"Ra 2024/09/0086","documentType":"decision","id":"jwr_2024090086_20250603l04","institution":["VwGH"],"normId":"jwr_2024090086_20250603l04","value":"Ra 2024/09/0086"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2024/09/0086","Rechtssatznummer":"6","citation":"Ra 2024/09/0086","documentType":"decision","id":"jwr_2024090086_20250603l06","institution":["VwGH"],"normId":"jwr_2024090086_20250603l06","value":"Ra 2024/09/0086"},{"abbreviation":"VwGG","citation":"§ 42 Abs. 3 VwGG","clauseId":"NOR40148077","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 42","id":"10000795.48.3","lawType":"BG","normId":"10000795","value":"§ 42 Abs. 3 VwGG"},{"abbreviation":"VwGG","citation":"VwGG","clauseId":"NOR40263266","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 0","id":"10000795","lawType":"BG","normId":"10000795","value":"VwGG "},{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2021/07/0072","Rechtssatznummer":"1","citation":"Ra 2021/07/0072","documentType":"decision","id":"jwr_2021070072_20230309l01","institution":["VwGH"],"normId":"jwr_2021070072_20230309l01","value":"Ra 2021/07/0072"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2021/07/0072","citation":"Ra 2021/07/0072","documentType":"decision","id":"jwt_2021070072_20230309l00","institution":["VwGH"],"normId":"jwt_2021070072_20230309l00","value":"Ra 2021/07/0072"},{"abbreviation":"VwGG","citation":"§ 55 VwGG","clauseId":"NOR40148091","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 55","id":"10000795.62","lawType":"BG","normId":"10000795","value":"§ 55 VwGG"},{"abbreviation":"VwGG","citation":"§ 58 Abs. 2 VwGG","clauseId":"NOR40148093","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 58","id":"10000795.65.1","lawType":"BG","normId":"10000795","value":"§ 58 Abs. 2 VwGG"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2022/09/0144","Rechtssatznummer":"9","citation":"Ra 2022/09/0144","documentType":"decision","id":"jwr_2022090144_20230906l09","institution":["VwGH"],"normId":"jwr_2022090144_20230906l09","value":"Ra 2022/09/0144"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2022/09/0144","Rechtssatznummer":"8","citation":"Ra 2022/09/0144","documentType":"decision","id":"jwr_2022090144_20230906l08","institution":["VwGH"],"normId":"jwr_2022090144_20230906l08","value":"Ra 2022/09/0144"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2022/09/0144","Rechtssatznummer":"7","citation":"Ra 2022/09/0144","documentType":"decision","id":"jwr_2022090144_20230906l07","institution":["VwGH"],"normId":"jwr_2022090144_20230906l07","value":"Ra 2022/09/0144"}],"snippet":"Der Verwaltungsgerichtshof hat durch den Vorsitzenden Senatspräsident Dr. Doblinger, den Hofrat Mag. Feiel sowie die Hofrätin Mag. Schindler als Richter, unter Mitwirkung der Schriftführerin Mag. a Rieder, über die außerordentliche Revision des Mag. A B in C, gegen den Beschluss des Personalausschus…","source":"ris"},"highlight":{"content":{"matched_tokens":["Ra","2024","09","0086"],"snippet":"wies der Personalausschuss den Wiederaufnahmeantrag ab, wogegen sich die gegenständliche außerordentliche Revision richtet. 2 Der Verwaltungsgerichtshof hob mit Erkenntnis vom 3. Juni 2025, Ra 2024/09/0086-17, das eingangs genannte Erkenntnis des Personalausschusses betreffend die Dienstbeurteilung des Revisionswerbers für das Jahr 2020 wegen Rechtswidrigkeit seines Inhaltes auf. Damit trat diese"}},"highlights":[{"field":"content","matched_tokens":["Ra","2024","09","0086"],"snippet":"wies der Personalausschuss den Wiederaufnahmeantrag ab, wogegen sich die gegenständliche außerordentliche Revision richtet. 2 Der Verwaltungsgerichtshof hob mit Erkenntnis vom 3. Juni 2025, Ra 2024/09/0086-17, das eingangs genannte Erkenntnis des Personalausschusses betreffend die Dienstbeurteilung des Revisionswerbers für das Jahr 2020 wegen Rechtswidrigkeit seines Inhaltes auf. Damit trat diese"}],"hybrid_search_info":{"rank_fusion_score":0.75},"text_match":2314894167458709500,"text_match_info":{"best_field_score":"4419510861824","best_field_weight":11,"fields_matched":2,"num_tokens_dropped":0,"score":"2314894167458709594","tokens_matched":4,"typo_prefix_score":0}}]}],"out_of":1411383,"page":1,"request_params":{"collection_name":"documents","first_q":"Ra 2024/09/0086","per_page":40,"q":"Ra 2024/09/0086"},"search_cutoff":false,"search_time_ms":4194,"richResult":"$undefined"}

Rückverweise

Ra 2025/09/0030—VwGH Entscheidung