37:{"facet_counts":[{"counts":[{"count":1,"highlighted":"decision","value":"decision"}],"field_name":"documentType","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":1}},{"counts":[{"count":1,"highlighted":"VwGH","value":"VwGH"}],"field_name":"institution","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":1}},{"counts":[],"field_name":"lawType","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":0}},{"counts":[],"field_name":"legalCategories","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":0}},{"counts":[],"field_name":"state","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":0}}],"found":1,"found_docs":1,"grouped_hits":[{"found":1,"group_key":["jwt_2025200052_20250512l00"],"hits":[{"document":{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2025/20/0052","apiPath":["Vwgh"],"changedDate":1750118400000,"citation":"Ra 2025/20/0052","contentType":"head","decisionDate":1747008000000,"documentType":"decision","hasSummary":false,"id":"jwt_2025200052_20250512l00","institution":["VwGH"],"institutionType":"Gericht","keywords":[],"legalCategories":[],"normId":"jwt_2025200052_20250512l00","publishedDate":1749513600000,"refs":[{"abbreviation":"AsylG 2005","citation":"AsylG 2005","clauseId":"NOR40269271","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 0","id":"20004240","lawType":"BG","normId":"20004240","value":"AsylG 2005 "},{"abbreviation":"VwGG","citation":"§ 34 Abs. 1 VwGG","clauseId":"NOR40228871","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 34","id":"10000795.37.0","lawType":"BG","normId":"10000795","value":"§ 34 Abs. 1 VwGG"},{"abbreviation":"VwGG","citation":"§ 34 Abs. 1a VwGG","clauseId":"NOR40228871","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 34","id":"10000795.37.1","lawType":"BG","normId":"10000795","value":"§ 34 Abs. 1a VwGG"},{"abbreviation":"VwGG","citation":"§ 25a Abs. 1 VwGG","clauseId":"NOR40254651","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 25a","id":"10000795.26.0","lawType":"BG","normId":"10000795","value":"§ 25a Abs. 1 VwGG"},{"abbreviation":"VwGG","citation":"§ 28 Abs. 3 VwGG","clauseId":"NOR40196853","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 28","id":"10000795.28.3","lawType":"BG","normId":"10000795","value":"§ 28 Abs. 3 VwGG"},{"abbreviation":"AsylG 2005","citation":"§ 19 AsylG 2005","clauseId":"NOR40180784","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 19","id":"20004240.25","lawType":"BG","normId":"20004240","value":"§ 19 AsylG 2005"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2022/20/0221","citation":"Ra 2022/20/0221","documentType":"decision","id":"jwt_2022200221_20221205l00","institution":["VwGH"],"normId":"jwt_2022200221_20221205l00","value":"Ra 2022/20/0221"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2020/20/0420","citation":"Ra 2020/20/0420","documentType":"decision","id":"jwt_2020200420_20210121l00","institution":["VwGH"],"normId":"jwt_2020200420_20210121l00","value":"Ra 2020/20/0420"},{"abbreviation":"AsylG 2005","citation":"§ 19 Abs. 1 AsylG 2005","clauseId":"NOR40180784","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 19","id":"20004240.25.0","lawType":"BG","normId":"20004240","value":"§ 19 Abs. 1 AsylG 2005"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2023/20/0351","citation":"Ra 2023/20/0351","documentType":"decision","id":"jwt_2023200351_20230907l00","institution":["VwGH"],"normId":"jwt_2023200351_20230907l00","value":"Ra 2023/20/0351"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2023/20/0186","citation":"Ra 2023/20/0186","documentType":"decision","id":"jwt_2023200186_20240124l00","institution":["VwGH"],"normId":"jwt_2023200186_20240124l00","value":"Ra 2023/20/0186"}],"snippet":"Der Verwaltungsgerichtshof hat durch die Vorsitzende Senatspräsidentin Mag. a Nussbaumer Hinterauer und die Hofräte Mag. Eder sowie Mag. M. Mayr als Richterin und Richter, unter Mitwirkung der Schriftführerin Mag. a Stüger, in der Rechtssache der Revision des K O, vertreten durch Dr. Philipp Spring…","source":"ris"},"highlight":{"content":{"matched_tokens":["Ra","2022","0221"],"snippet":"ist nicht berechtigt, die Beweiswürdigung des Verwaltungsgerichtes mit der Begründung zu verwerfen, dass auch ein anderer Sachverhalt schlüssig begründbar wäre (vgl. VwGH 5.12.2022, Ra 2022/20/0221, mwN). 9 Der Verwaltungsgerichtshof hat in seiner Rechtsprechung zwar wiederholt Bedenken gegen die unreflektierte Verwertung von Beweisergebnissen der Erstbefragung erhoben, weil sich diese Einvernahme nicht"}},"highlights":[{"field":"content","matched_tokens":["Ra","2022","0221"],"snippet":"ist nicht berechtigt, die Beweiswürdigung des Verwaltungsgerichtes mit der Begründung zu verwerfen, dass auch ein anderer Sachverhalt schlüssig begründbar wäre (vgl. VwGH 5.12.2022, Ra 2022/20/0221, mwN). 9 Der Verwaltungsgerichtshof hat in seiner Rechtsprechung zwar wiederholt Bedenken gegen die unreflektierte Verwertung von Beweisergebnissen der Erstbefragung erhoben, weil sich diese Einvernahme nicht"}],"hybrid_search_info":{"rank_fusion_score":0.75},"text_match":2312642367645024000,"text_match_info":{"best_field_score":"3319999234048","best_field_weight":11,"fields_matched":2,"num_tokens_dropped":0,"score":"2312642367645024346","tokens_matched":4,"typo_prefix_score":0}}]}],"out_of":1416049,"page":1,"request_params":{"collection_name":"documents","first_q":"Ra 2022/19/0221","per_page":40,"q":"Ra 2022/19/0221"},"search_cutoff":false,"search_time_ms":4237,"richResult":"$undefined"}

Rückverweise

Ra 2025/20/0052—VwGH Entscheidung