36:{"facet_counts":[{"counts":[{"count":1,"highlighted":"decision","value":"decision"}],"field_name":"documentType","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":1}},{"counts":[{"count":1,"highlighted":"VwGH","value":"VwGH"}],"field_name":"institution","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":1}},{"counts":[],"field_name":"lawType","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":0}},{"counts":[],"field_name":"legalCategories","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":0}},{"counts":[],"field_name":"state","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":0}}],"found":1,"found_docs":1,"grouped_hits":[{"found":1,"group_key":["jwt_2024100155_20250926l00"],"hits":[{"document":{"Geschaeftszahl":"Ra 2024/10/0155","apiPath":["Vwgh"],"changedDate":1761091200000,"citation":"Ra 2024/10/0155","contentType":"head","decisionDate":1758844800000,"documentType":"decision","hasSummary":false,"id":"jwt_2024100155_20250926l00","institution":["VwGH"],"institutionType":"Gericht","keywords":["Auswertung in Arbeit!"],"legalCategories":[],"normId":"jwt_2024100155_20250926l00","publishedDate":1761091200000,"refs":[],"snippet":"Der Verwaltungsgerichtshof hat durch den Vorsitzenden Senatspräsident Dr. Grünstäudl sowie die Hofräte Dr. Hofbauer und Dr. Eisner als Richter, unter Mitwirkung der Schriftführerin Mag. a Prendinger, über die Revision des Bürgermeisters der Landeshauptstadt Linz gegen den Beschluss des Landesverwalt…","source":"ris"},"highlight":{"content":{"matched_tokens":["Ra","2018","22","0276","22"],"snippet":"zu verweisen (vgl. VwGH 27.1.2025, Ra 2023/05/0228; 22.2.2022, Ra 2021/21/0308; 14.5.2020, Ro 2019/22/0005; 14.11.2019, Ra 2018/22/0276; 26.3.2015, Ro 2015/22/0011), wonach aus dem Hinweis des Verwaltungsgerichtes, dass es zu einer Verkürzung des „gesetzlich intendierten Instanzenzuges“ käme, nichts"}},"highlights":[{"field":"content","matched_tokens":["Ra","2018","22","0276","22"],"snippet":"zu verweisen (vgl. VwGH 27.1.2025, Ra 2023/05/0228; 22.2.2022, Ra 2021/21/0308; 14.5.2020, Ro 2019/22/0005; 14.11.2019, Ra 2018/22/0276; 26.3.2015, Ro 2015/22/0011), wonach aus dem Hinweis des Verwaltungsgerichtes, dass es zu einer Verkürzung des „gesetzlich intendierten Instanzenzuges“ käme, nichts"}],"hybrid_search_info":{"rank_fusion_score":0.75},"text_match":2314894167458709500,"text_match_info":{"best_field_score":"4419510861824","best_field_weight":11,"fields_matched":2,"num_tokens_dropped":0,"score":"2314894167458709594","tokens_matched":4,"typo_prefix_score":0}}]}],"out_of":1413300,"page":1,"request_params":{"collection_name":"documents","first_q":"Ra 2018/22/0276","per_page":40,"q":"Ra 2018/22/0276"},"search_cutoff":false,"search_time_ms":4162,"richResult":"$undefined"}

Rückverweise

Ra 2024/10/0155—VwGH Entscheidung