3f:{"facet_counts":[{"counts":[{"count":1,"highlighted":"decision","value":"decision"},{"count":1,"highlighted":"rechtssatz","value":"rechtssatz"}],"field_name":"documentType","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":2}},{"counts":[{"count":2,"highlighted":"VfGH","value":"VfGH"}],"field_name":"institution","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":1}},{"counts":[],"field_name":"lawType","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":0}},{"counts":[],"field_name":"legalCategories","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":0}},{"counts":[],"field_name":"state","sampled":false,"stats":{"total_values":0}}],"found":2,"found_docs":2,"grouped_hits":[{"found":1,"group_key":["jft_20141008_10b01170_00"],"hits":[{"document":{"Geschaeftszahl":"B1170/2010 ua","apiPath":["Vfgh"],"changedDate":1414022400000,"citation":"B1170/2010 ua","contentType":"head","decisionDate":1412726400000,"documentType":"decision","hasSummary":false,"id":"jft_20141008_10b01170_00","institution":["VfGH"],"institutionType":"Gericht","keywords":["VfGH / Anlassfall"],"legalCategories":[],"normId":"jft_20141008_10b01170_00","refs":[{"Geschaeftszahl":"B1170/2010 ua","citation":"B1170/2010 ua","documentType":"decision","id":"jft_20141008_10b01170_00","institution":["VfGH"],"normId":"jft_20141008_10b01170_00","value":"B1170/2010"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"B1170/2010 ua","Rechtssatznummer":"B1170/2010 ua","citation":"B1170/2010 ua","documentType":"decision","id":"jfr_20141008_10b01170_01","institution":["VfGH"],"normId":"jfr_20141008_10b01170_01","value":"B1170/2010"},{"abbreviation":"BAO","citation":"§ 289 Abs. 2 BAO","clauseId":"NOR40145123","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 289","id":"10003940.331.2","lawType":"BG","normId":"10003940","value":"§289 Abs2 BAO"},{"abbreviation":"StGG","citation":"Art. 5 StGG","clauseId":"NOR12000061","documentType":"law","enumeration":"Art. 5","id":"10000006.5","lawType":"BVG","normId":"10000006","value":"Art5 StGG"},{"abbreviation":"StGG","citation":"Art. 18 StGG","clauseId":"NOR12000057","documentType":"law","enumeration":"Art. 18","id":"10000006.19","lawType":"BVG","normId":"10000006","value":"Art18 StGG"},{"abbrNr":2,"abbreviation":"EMRK","citation":"Art. 6 EMRK","clauseId":"NOR12016955","documentType":"law","enumeration":"Art. 6","id":"10000309.6","lawType":"Vertrag","normId":"10000309","value":"Art6 EMRK"},{"abbreviation":"StGG","citation":"Art. 6 Abs. 1 StGG","clauseId":"NOR12000062","documentType":"law","enumeration":"Art. 6","id":"10000006.6.0","lawType":"BVG","normId":"10000006","value":"Art6 Abs1 StGG"},{"abbreviation":"BAO","citation":"BAO","clauseId":"NOR30007067","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 0","id":"10003940","lawType":"BG","normId":"10003940","value":"BAO "},{"abbreviation":"ZPO","citation":"ZPO","clauseId":"NOR30004070","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 0","id":"10001699","lawType":"BG","normId":"10001699","value":"ZPO "},{"abbreviation":"VfGG","citation":"§ 35 VfGG","clauseId":"NOR40166292","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 35","id":"10000245.47","lawType":"BG","normId":"10000245","value":"§35 VfGG"},{"abbreviation":"VfGG","citation":"§ 88 VfGG","clauseId":"NOR40147876","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 88","id":"10000245.126","lawType":"BG","normId":"10000245","value":"§88 VfGG"},{"abbreviation":"VfGG","citation":"VfGG","clauseId":"NOR30001678","documentType":"law","enumeration":"§ 0","id":"10000245","lawType":"BG","normId":"10000245","value":"VfGG "}],"snippet":"I. Die beschwerdeführenden Gesellschaften zu B1170/2010, B1171/2010, B1172/2010 sowie B235/2012 und der Beschwerdeführer zu B968/2013 sowie B281/2014 sind durch die angefochtenen Bescheide wegen Anwendung eines verfassungswidrigen Gesetzes in ihren Rechten verletzt worden. Die Bescheide werden aufg…","source":"ris"},"highlight":{"content":{"matched_tokens":["B1170","2010","2010","2010"],"snippet":"I. Die beschwerdeführenden Gesellschaften zu B1170/2010, B1171/2010, B1172/2010 sowie B235/2012 und der Beschwerdeführer zu B968/2013 sowie B281/2014 sind durch die angefochtenen Bescheide wegen Anwendung eines verfassungswidrigen"}},"highlights":[{"field":"content","matched_tokens":["B1170","2010","2010","2010"],"snippet":"I. Die beschwerdeführenden Gesellschaften zu B1170/2010, B1171/2010, B1172/2010 sowie B235/2012 und der Beschwerdeführer zu B968/2013 sowie B281/2014 sind durch die angefochtenen Bescheide wegen Anwendung eines verfassungswidrigen"}],"hybrid_search_info":{"rank_fusion_score":1},"text_match":1736172819517538300,"text_match_info":{"best_field_score":"3315704398080","best_field_weight":15,"fields_matched":2,"num_tokens_dropped":0,"score":"1736172819517538426","tokens_matched":3,"typo_prefix_score":0},"vector_distance":0.8999309539794922}]},{"found":1,"group_key":["jfr_20141008_14g00142_01"],"hits":[{"document":{"Geschaeftszahl":"G142/2014 ua","Rechtssatznummer":"G142/2014 ua","apiPath":["Vfgh"],"changedDate":1457913600000,"citation":"G142/2014 ua","contentType":"head","decisionDate":1412726400000,"documentType":"rechtssatz","hasSummary":false,"id":"jfr_20141008_14g00142_01","institution":["VfGH"],"institutionType":"Gericht","keywords":["Marktordnung","Strafrecht","Tribunal","VfGH / Prüfungsumfang"],"legalCategories":[],"normId":"jfr_20141008_14g00142_01","refs":[{"abbrNr":2,"abbreviation":"EMRK","citation":"Art. 6 EMRK","clauseId":"NOR12016955","documentType":"law","enumeration":"Art. 6","id":"10000309.6","lawType":"Vertrag","normId":"10000309","value":"Art6 EMRK"},{"abbrNr":2,"abbreviation":"EMRK","citation":"Art. 6 Abs. 1 EMRK","clauseId":"NOR12016955","documentType":"law","enumeration":"Art. 6","id":"10000309.6.0","lawType":"Vertrag","normId":"10000309","value":"Art6 Abs1 EMRK"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"B1170/2010 ua","citation":"B1170/2010 ua","documentType":"decision","id":"jft_20141008_10b01170_00","institution":["VfGH"],"normId":"jft_20141008_10b01170_00","value":"B1170/2010 ua"},{"Geschaeftszahl":"B1170/2010 ua","Rechtssatznummer":"B1170/2010 ua","citation":"B1170/2010 ua","documentType":"decision","id":"jfr_20141008_10b01170_01","institution":["VfGH"],"normId":"jfr_20141008_10b01170_01","value":"B1170/2010 ua"}],"snippet":"§21g Abs3 AMA-G 1992, BGBl 376 idF BGBl I 55/2007, war bis zum Ablauf des 31.12.2013 verfassungswidrig. Anfechtungsumfang nicht zu eng gewählt. Der VfGH hat Bedenken gegen die gesetzliche Regelung, wonach Erhöhungsbeiträge in einem Ausmaß, dass sie einer strafrechtlichen Sanktion entsprechen, verhän…","source":"ris"},"highlight":{"content":{"matched_tokens":["B1170","2010","ua"],"snippet":"die Agrarmarkt Austria Erhöhungsbeiträge nach §21g Abs3 AMA-G vorschreibt, mittels Beschwerde an das Bundesverwaltungsgericht, einem Tribunal iSd Art6 EMRK, bekämpft werden können. (Anlassfall B1170/2010 ua, E v 08.10.2014, Aufhebung der angefochtenen Bescheide)."}},"highlights":[{"field":"content","matched_tokens":["B1170","2010","ua"],"snippet":"die Agrarmarkt Austria Erhöhungsbeiträge nach §21g Abs3 AMA-G vorschreibt, mittels Beschwerde an das Bundesverwaltungsgericht, einem Tribunal iSd Art6 EMRK, bekämpft werden können. (Anlassfall B1170/2010 ua, E v 08.10.2014, Aufhebung der angefochtenen Bescheide)."}],"hybrid_search_info":{"rank_fusion_score":0.5},"text_match":1736172819517014000,"text_match_info":{"best_field_score":"3315704397824","best_field_weight":11,"fields_matched":2,"num_tokens_dropped":0,"score":"1736172819517014106","tokens_matched":3,"typo_prefix_score":0},"vector_distance":0.9182299971580505}]}],"out_of":1420850,"page":1,"request_params":{"collection_name":"documents","first_q":"B1170/2010 ua","per_page":40,"q":"B1170/2010 ua"},"search_cutoff":false,"search_time_ms":4737,"richResult":"$undefined"}

Rückverweise

Rückverweise

B1170/2010 ua—VfGH Entscheidung

G142/2014 ua—VfGH Rechtssatz